did you miss that part about "few or no sales"? there were few or no buyers,
yo-yo. hence, the reason for the 50% prices.

geesh. booms always end. they have to.

From: "OzOne
Date: 10/6/2004 8:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:


Eh Jocks, like I said, they lost because they sold em.
Thanks for confirming that.


On 06 Oct 2004 12:11:52 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

yo-yo, people who bought apartments in NYC in 1989 had to wait until about
1997
for their apartments to again be worth what they owed the bank on it.

yo-yo, I live here and as you might expect know one or two people, and
worked
with maybe one or two more.

also, yo-you, should you bother to check around with an adult or two you
will
find that a.) booms always end [they have to], and the b.) end is shortly
after
everyone says there is no end.

From: "OzOne
Date: 10/6/2004 2:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 06 Oct 2004 01:45:30 GMT, (JAXAshby) scribbled
thusly:

At no time did anyone I know lose money on a NY apartment. They all
doubled
their money or much better.

My memory goes back to 1989, and I knew a whole bunch of people who lost
money
on NY apartments.

that's because they sold em Jocks!
Imagine if they still had those 1989 properties now.



Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.