DSK wrote:


OK, in that case prove it. You explain 1- how tip vortex forms 2-
your calculations as to which represents a greater energy loss...
flow effects across the upper main from a frac jib, or combined tip
vortex from main + masthead jib.

If you can't explain it clearly, then you're bluffing. There is no
third alternative, is there?


MC wrote:
There is. That it would be a complete waste of my time trying to post
something you do not have the education to understand.


In other words, it's #2...

Nope, its exactly as I wrote. I won't waste my time explain any
complicated problems to someone who is incapable of undertstanding them.
That's why I only try to simplify a few thing that you might begin to
get the idea. Of course I'm probably wasting my time with a bigot.

Cheers